With its stock down 15% over the past three months, it is easy to disregard Genetic Signatures (ASX:GSS). However, stock prices are usually driven by a company’s financials over the long term, which in this case look pretty respectable. Specifically, we decided to study Genetic Signatures’ ROE in this article.
Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company’s shareholders.
Our analysis indicates that GSS is potentially overvalued!
How Is ROE Calculated?
The formula for ROE is:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders’ Equity
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Genetic Signatures is:
5.6% = AU$3.1m ÷ AU$55m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2022).
The ‘return’ is the annual profit. Another way to think of that is that for every A$1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn A$0.06 in profit.
What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?
So far, we’ve learned that ROE is a measure of a company’s profitability. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or “retains” for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don’t necessarily bear these characteristics.
Genetic Signatures’ Earnings Growth And 5.6% ROE
When you first look at it, Genetic Signatures’ ROE doesn’t look that attractive. A quick further study shows that the company’s ROE does not compare favorably to the industry average of 12% either. However, we were pleasantly surprised to see that Genetic Signatures grew its net income at a significant rate of 52% in the last five years. So, there might be other aspects that are positively influencing the company’s earnings growth. Such as – high earnings retention or an efficient management in place.
Next, on comparing Genetic Signatures’ net income growth with the industry, we found that the company’s reported growth is similar to the industry average growth rate of 43% in the same period.
Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. Is Genetic Signatures fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide.
Is Genetic Signatures Efficiently Re-investing Its Profits?
Given that Genetic Signatures does not pay any dividend to its shareholders, we infer that the company has been reinvesting all of its profits to grow its business.
In total, it does look like Genetic Signatures has some positive aspects to its business. Despite its low rate of return, the fact that the company reinvests a very high portion of its profits into its business, no doubt contributed to its high earnings growth. With that said, on studying the latest analyst forecasts, we found that while the company has seen growth in its past earnings, analysts expect its future earnings to shrink. To know more about the latest analysts’ predictions for the company, check out this visualization of analysts’ forecasts for the company.
Valuation is complex, but we’re helping make it simple.
Find out whether Genetic Signatures is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.
View the Free Analysis
Do you have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take into account your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.